HPLC help

 
 
 
MAIN
HPLC TOPICS
LC-MS TOPICS
HPLC Course
FTIR page
Courses & Events
Educational
links
LINKS
PERSONAL



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MAIN

HPLC TOPICS
LC-MS TOPICS
HPLC Course
FTIR page
Courses & Events
Educational
links
LINKS
PERSONAL
EMAIL Me














DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A CHROMATOGRAPHIC METHOD

(This manuscript is part of the HPLC Course given by Dr. Shulamit Levin, Medtechnica)
  1. REFERENCE STANDARDS:

    • 1.a. Established source and known grade (DMF - Drug Master File

    • or COA - Certificate of Analysis)
    • 1.b. Percentage of purity from assay will be taken into account in the calculations.
    • 1.c. Amount of residual compounds (GC, heavy metals, inorganic salts, water,

    • residual solvents, weight loss) should be known.
  2. CHOICE OF STANDARDIZATION: EXTERNAL OR INTERNAL

    • 2.a. Simple formations and sample preparation: external standard
    • 2.b. Gas chromatography, bio-studies or complex medium and sample

    • preparation: internal standard.
  3. SELECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CHROMATOGRAPHIC METHOD:

    • 3.a. The chromatographic method from the literature (Pharmacopoeia) must be the first

    • choice, with freedom of coloumn choice (according to the Lx tables in the USP).
      Peak shape should be examined in this step already (see 4.a.).
    • 3.b. The method should be adjusted to be stability indicating and selective, if this is

    • impossible, a new method should be developed and validated to be stability indicating.
    • 3.c. Potential impurities and degradation products should be used with the sample medium.
    • 3.d. Peak purity of the active substance is checked (by phodo-diode array detector to verify

    • that the method is selective, and a single component peak is quantified.
    • 3.e. The analysis time range should be kept practical, no more than 40 min, i.e., the retention

    • parameter should be kept k(first) >= 2 and k(last) <= 40 (flow-rate, column length and solvent
      composition can be adjusted to speed up the separation).
    • 3.f. Final method is defined by the following parameters:
      • Column type: geometry and brand
      • Mobile phase
      • Flow rate and pressure
      • Temperature
      • Sample volume
      • Detection
      • Sample preparation(ID)
  4. COLUMN AND INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE:

SYSTEM SUITABILITY TEST
    The following parameters must be checked, preferably during method development:
    • 4.a. Number of theoretical plates, N>=2000. [16(tR/W) ^2]
    • 4.b. Tailing factor 0.5 <= T =< 2.

    • If these requirements cannot be fulfilled, the column must be replaced. This test is done
      during the method development (3.a.).
    • 4.c. Precision RSD <= 1-2% in 10 injections of the standard. If RSD > 1%, the

    • autosampler should be checked, or a leak might be detected in the instrument.
    • 4.d. Resolution, Rs >= 2 between adjacent peaks; [(tR2-tR1)/0.5(w1+w2)]
    Note:
    This step should be measured as part of adjustment of the method to be stability indicating and selective.
    Sections 1 and 2 verify that the chromatographic system and column follow the requirements
    of the analysis. The next steps aim to establish the method of analysis.
     
  1. METHOD VALIDATION
    • 5.a. Linearity: the range of linearity is checked by injections of 5-6 concentrations of the

    • reference standards (in triplicates) below and above the expected concentration of the
      samples (20%-120%). The slope and intercept are determined. r >= 0.999, and the
      range of linearity (in conc. terms) is established.
    • 5.b. Accuracy is measured as the (amount measured)/(amount claimed) in the following

    • procedures:
      • In drug formulations: a standard is added to the placebo (80%, 100%, 120%), and the

      • recovery is measured
      • Recovery from sample preparation procedures (such as dilution, extraction or

      • filtration) should be established.
      • Solution stability of the samples (A fresh sample is compared to one which was left in

      • solution for the entire duration of the test procedure).
    • 5.c. Intermediate precision or ruggedness: 5 measurements of the first step of accuracy under two

    • different occasions (two columns, or two operators).
    • 5.d. Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ):
      • The intercept from the linearity test (in section 5.a) can be used for LOQ

      • measurements (intercept x 5 or 10).
      • Analysis of repeatability at the quantification limit, using both sample and reference

      • standard. Concentrations that yield 10-15% RSD will be acceptable as LOQ concentrations.
      • 5.e. Robustness of the chromatographic method: variables in this test can be the

      • following: column batch #, solvent strength in the mobile phase, temperature, flow rate,
        pH of the mobile phase, ionic strength in the mobile phase, sample diluent,
        injection volume, wavelength of detection. The parameter measured: response,
        retention time, selectivity and/or resolution.
NOTE:
If the step of method development is done systematically and documented well, robustness
can be established at early stages.

Robustness of the sample preparation procedure: variables in this test can be the
following: duration of extraction, extraction medium, filtration type, temperatures.
Parameter measured: accuracy.
 
 
 
Please note: This document is the sole property of Shula Levin. Reproduction of this document without the express permission of Shula Levin, for any purpose, is strictly forbidden

Home|| HPLC Topics || LC-MS TOPICS || HPLC Course || Educational || Links
Courses || Personal || FTIR || Contact Me
 

Copyright (C)2000 Dr. Shulamit Levin